Skip to main content
Back to Blog

Show vs. Tell: A Developmental Editor's Guide to the #1 Prose Issue

writing craftproseediting

"Show, don't tell" is the first piece of writing advice most authors receive, and probably the most frequently misunderstood. It appears in more editorial reports than any other single issue — across genres, experience levels, and manuscript lengths. When we built Galleys' editorial analysis pipeline, "showing vs. telling" was one of the first prose patterns we calibrated the system to detect.

But "show, don't tell" isn't a universal rule. It's a tool with specific applications, and knowing when to use it — and when not to — is what separates effective revision from mechanical rule-following.

What "Show, Don't Tell" Actually Means

Telling is when the narrator directly states a character's emotion, trait, or the significance of an event.

Sarah was angry.

Showing is when the author presents evidence — actions, dialogue, physical sensations, concrete details — that allows the reader to infer the emotion, trait, or significance.

Sarah's jaw tightened. She set her coffee down hard enough to slosh it over the rim, then walked out without a word.

The difference isn't just stylistic. Showing engages the reader as an active participant — they're interpreting, inferring, experiencing. Telling keeps them at a distance — they're receiving information, not experiencing a scene.

Why Telling Is So Common in First Drafts

Telling isn't a sign of bad writing. It's a sign of efficient drafting. When you're getting the story down, you write what you mean directly:

John was a kind man who cared deeply about his community.

That's a perfectly clear statement. It communicates what you need the reader to know. The problem is that it doesn't make the reader feel it. And in fiction, feeling is everything.

First drafts are full of telling because the author is figuring out the story. Revision is where you go back and convert the key moments from told summaries into shown scenes. Not every moment — just the ones that matter.

The Five Most Common Telling Patterns

After analyzing thousands of manuscript chapters, these are the telling patterns we see most often:

1. Emotion Labels

Telling: She felt sad. Showing: Her eyes burned. She pressed her thumbnail into her palm until it left a white crescent, focusing on that small sharp pain instead of the larger one.

Emotion labels are the most flagged issue. Readers don't need to be told what a character feels if the character's behavior makes it obvious.

2. Character Trait Declarations

Telling: Marcus was brilliant but arrogant. Showing: Marcus solved the equation in three steps while the rest of the team was still parsing the problem statement. He slid the whiteboard marker back into the tray without looking at anyone.

Let the character demonstrate their traits through action and dialogue. The reader's conclusion is more powerful than the narrator's declaration.

3. Relationship Summaries

Telling: They had a complicated relationship. Showing: When her mother called, she let it ring four times before answering. "Hi, Mom." Two words. Both careful.

Don't summarize the relationship — show a moment that reveals it.

4. Backstory Exposition

Telling: Growing up poor had taught him the value of money. Showing: He counted the change twice at the register, the way his mother used to count the bills on the kitchen table every Thursday night — laying them flat, smoothing the creases, as if the ritual itself could make them multiply.

Backstory works best when it surfaces through character behavior in the present, not through narrator-delivered summaries.

5. Significance Flags

Telling: It was the most important decision of her life. Showing: Let the scene's context, stakes, and the character's behavior convey the significance. If you've done your job with the preceding chapters, the reader already knows this decision is pivotal.

When Telling Is Actually Better

Here's the part that "show, don't tell" purists get wrong: some moments should be told, not shown.

Transitions. "Three weeks passed" is telling. It's also efficient and appropriate. You don't need to show three weeks of daily life to cover a time jump.

Low-stakes information. "She drove to the office" doesn't need to be a detailed scene unless something important happens during the drive. Some actions are connective tissue, and telling handles them cleanly.

Pacing control. A chapter of relentless showing can be exhausting. Strategic telling lets you vary the pace — zoom in on crucial moments (showing) and zoom out on connective moments (telling).

Summary of repeated events. "Every morning, he ran five miles before dawn" is more efficient than showing five separate morning runs.

The principle isn't "always show." It's "show the moments that matter, and tell the rest."

How to Identify Telling in Your Manuscript

Search for emotion words. Ctrl+F for "felt," "was angry," "was happy," "was sad," "was nervous," "was afraid." These are often telling flags. Not every instance needs fixing, but each one is worth evaluating.

Search for "was" + adjective. "He was brave." "She was tired." "They were excited." These are almost always telling.

Look for narrator editorializing. Anywhere the narrator comments on the significance of events ("Little did she know..." or "It was a turning point") is telling that could likely be shown instead.

Use an analytical tool. Galleys' analysis pipeline flags show-vs-tell issues at the chapter level, with specific quotes and suggested rewrites. It's faster than manual searching and catches patterns you might not notice in your own prose.

The Revision Process

When you find a telling passage that should be shown, ask three questions:

  1. What is the character physically doing? Ground the emotion in the body.
  2. What specific detail makes this moment unique? Generic showing ("she clenched her fists") is only marginally better than telling. Specific showing ("she pressed her thumbnail into her palm until it left a white crescent") is memorable.
  3. Can dialogue carry it? Sometimes the most effective showing is a single line of dialogue that reveals everything the narrator was trying to explain.

Not every told passage needs a full scene expansion. Sometimes a single concrete detail is enough to convert telling into showing without bloating the word count.

The Goal

The goal isn't to eliminate all telling from your manuscript. It's to ensure that the moments that matter most to your reader — the emotional peaks, the character revelations, the turning points — are experienced, not just reported. Master that balance, and your prose will come alive.

Ready to improve your manuscript?

Try Galleys free — paste a chapter and get a full editorial report in minutes.